Subject	Syncronizers? Lack thereof. :) Dog gear engagement >>
Posted by	AshsZ (The Rebuild King) on November 19, 2002 at 1:15 PM
	This message has been viewed 134 times.
In Reply To	What are the pros and cons of dog gear engagement? posted by TomGreen on November 19, 2002 at 01:03 PM
Message	doesn't use syncronizers. You can see the engagement hubs how they have large squarish locks to engage the gear. I think the larger number of those locks make it less prone to grinding, which is one word they avoid using and instead call it "fuss". LOL but grindage it is. That's more of an all-out race gearbox design though.. Dont expect to get 100K miles out of it by any means. [ ashleypowers.com ] [ agpowers@bellsouth.net ] When pigs dance, you better get it on video... "You never really learn to swear until you learn to drive." -George Carlin
Follow Ups	What are the pros and cons of dog gear engagement? - TomGreen 13:03:32 11/19/02 Syncronizers? Lack thereof. :) Dog gear engagement >> - AshsZ (The Rebuild King) 13:15:55 11/19/02 so basically that would throw smooth shifting out the window (n/m) - TomGreen 13:27:01 11/19/02 It wouldn't be anything like your beloved Z32's tranny. (n/m) - AshsZ (The Rebuild King) 13:46:32 11/19/02 well on a 'race' tranny..who cares about smooth shifting - genic 14:04:21 11/19/02 Does that mean i get to be cool and double clutch? (n/m) - BDz32 (FL) 14:15:22 11/19/02 Heh, I was hoping no one would bring the gay and curious - AshsZ (The Rebuild King) 14:21:45 11/19/02 Re: What are the pros and cons of dog gear engagement? - sparkie 14:20:58 11/19/02 Clutches? I don't need no stinkin' clutches. >>> - Buzz 16:44:09 11/19/02 I can shift any tranny without using the clutch - Technomancer 14:11:46 11/20/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.